A lot of people, including the governor, don’t seem to understand why Corroon’s charges are sticking. It’s so simple, though. Not only did Gary Herbert not deny the factual basis of Corroon’s attacks in a recent KSL debate, he has continually failed to provide any kind of alternate explanation beyond “no I didn’t”. It doesn’t make for a very compelling argument, especially with how flustered the guv has gotten when confronted on those issues.
So what’s the deal, Gary? Is there some other story other than the one Peter tells? If so, do you want to share it with us? Until you do, the accusations have legs.